Representatives of the European Parliament, the European Commission and European Union member states
have endorsed with minor changes the version of the Directive on Alternative Investment Fund
Managers agreed last week by EU economic affairs and finance ministers.
The accord by the
so-called ‘trialogue’ meeting means that both the Parliament and the European Council,
which in May approved conflicting drafts of the directive, have now signed up to the compromise
proposal and paves the way for a vote on the proposal in a full session of the Parliament in the
second week of November.
The compromise text introduces an EU marketing
‘passport’ for alternative fund managers whether based within the 27-member union or
(after a two-year transition period, and subject to compliance with EU standards)) outside it.
It also preserves the existing system of country-by-country private placement rules for
distribution of alternative funds for at least five years, or until the Commission determines that
the passport system is operating satisfactorily.
The agreement has been criticised both
by industry members, who say it retains measures that will add disproportionate costs and regulatory
burdens, and EU parliamentarians lamenting that the legislation does not impose stricter rules on
alternative funds. However, the Parliament is widely expected to give the directive a first reading
at its plenary session in Brussels on November 10th and 11th.
By Olivier Sciales,
partner of Chevalier & Sciales (Luxembourg). You may find more information on our AIFM blog at
http://www.cs-avocats.lu/aifm-directive.
The purpose of this blog aims to provide up to
date news coverage and timely analysis of the legislative process and issues raised by the European
union’s Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers.
Follow me on twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/oliviersciales